Prediction of Jack Draper [6th] vs Tim Van Rijthoven [871st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W L W L
Form
W L L W L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Draper 1 - 1 Rijthoven
They have played 4 sets in total, with Draper winning 2 and Rijthoven winning 2. The last match between Draper and Rijthoven was at the Forli 4 Challenger, 20-02-2022, Final, I.hard with Jack Draper getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jack Draper | 1 |
| Tim Van Rijthoven | 1 |
| Draper | Stats | Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| 78% (14-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 6 | Ranking | 871 |
| 6 | Highest Rank | 101 |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 9 |
| 69% (244-110) | Career Total W/L | 62% (234-146) |
| $5,196,375 | Career Prize Money | $499,600 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Jack Draper
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:6:53 | Average Match Time | 1:6:53 |
| 61% (64/105) | 1st Serve % | 73% (68/93) |
| 77% (49/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (50/68) |
| 49% (20/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 35% (33/93) | Return Points Win % | 34% (36/105) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jack Draper vs Tim Van Rijthoven Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Draper 1 - 1 Rijthoven
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Draper has won 46.74% of points on their second serve, while Rijthoven has won 33.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Draper, in recent form, has won 46.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rijthoven has won 41.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.14% and 14.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Draper has saved 58.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rijthoven has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Draper has won 69.84% of matches played (W/L 44/ 19), with Rijthoven winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 81/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 25/ 20). Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 80/ 43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 80% of matches (W/L 20/ 5), where as Rijthoven has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Draper winning 1 times and Rijthoven being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Draper winning 2 and Rijthoven winning 2. The last match between Draper and Rijthoven was at the Forli 4 Challenger, 20-02-2022, Final, I.hard with Jack Draper getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Draper and Rijthoven have played a deciding set 0 times, with Draper winning 0 times and Rijthoven 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Draper winning 0, and Rijthoven 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Draper has played against opponents with an average rank of 50.81 while Rijthoven has played against players with an average rank of 182.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Draper has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rijthoven has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Draper has converted 34.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rijthoven has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jack Draper
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
98)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
10
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
41%
(
48 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Marcos Giron
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
21
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
19 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Holger Rune
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Carlos Alcaraz
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Ben Shelton
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taylor Fritz
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Jenson Brooksby
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Joao Fonseca
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
10
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
20 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
71%
(
75 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
45 of
54)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
25 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
21 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Draper vs Rijthoven?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Draper Vs Rijthoven is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69% (244/110) | Win/Loss | 62% (234/146) |
| 66% (554/287) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (523/364) |
| 56% (4434/3461) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4638/4187) |
| 0.61 | Aces Per Game | 0.62 |
| 2349 | Aces Total | 2674 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1104 | Total Double Faults | 854 |
| 1:38:44 | Average Match Time | 1:29:3 |
| 320.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 491.62 |
| 60% (13872/23285) | 1st Serve % | 63% (15413/24317) |
| 76% (10495/13872) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (11587/15413) |
| 51% (4757/9412) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (4783/8904) |
| 44% (1092/2498) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (801/2060) |
| 40% (9704/24188) | Return Points Win % | 36% (9228/25428) |
| 71% (220/310) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (227/366) |
| 61% (19/31) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 57% (65/115) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (99/173) |
| 58% (59/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (74/125) |
| 90% (234/210) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (227/199) |
| 9% (234/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (227/27) |
| 28% (120/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (153/34) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
